So I decided to take a couple photos today to compare the quality of the images from both the iPhone 7 plus and the Google Pixel XL. The first shot I took was in low light early morning with high contrast.
My opinion is that both cameras did a pretty decent job. These are straight off the phones. The Pixel image is a little bit more rich color wise as far as I’m concerned. If you look in the sky you see the difference.
Lowlight – iPhone
Lowlight – Google Pixel
The next test I decided to do was to use the “Portrait” mode on iOS 10.1 and the “Blur” effect on Google Pixel. The “Portrait” mode on the iPhone utilizes the two lenses on the iPhone and merges the photos with some magic to create bokeh or as some people are calling it fokeh. The Google Pixel on the other hand has you take a picture and then slowly move the phone upwards, and again uses software to create the effect. In my opinion the Pixel looks better for some reason. One is color. I can say though that it is easy to make a mistake with the Google Pixel version.
Shallow DoF – iPhone 7 Plus
Shallow DoF – Google Pixel
I think both phones do a great job I’ll do more test shots will update this post with more comparisons via a gallery over the next week.
My google Photo Album: https://goo.gl/photos/PQkXxDCQ9QQPeZ5Z9
So today I received my Google pixel XL. My first impressions are that the phone has a decent build quality. Interesting it is much lighter than my iPhone 7 plus. I still have not got used to the fingerprint reader on the back. I’m so used to unlocking my iPhone with the home button. This is the first product I’ve ever recorded an unboxing off too. Although my lighting sucked.
I was able to take a few photos and compare them with my iPhones. I do have to say the camera is pretty Sharp. Here are a couple examples photos taken in from both phones.
I did no editing or adjustments. The iPhone seems a little Overexposed in each photo.
There also are a couple Easter eggs in the new OS nougat. One of which I took a video of which was in Google Assistant. If you say “Ok Google I’m feeling lucky” it will launch you into a quiz show.
Another interesting feature I found out about is that it saying “Ok Google” unlocks the device if it determines it is your voice. One problem here is that you can cause your self issues if you watch a video of yourself saying the key words…
So far so good. I’ll post another review in a day or so after I get more time with the device. I’m still waiting on my Daydream VR as well to play with that.
Want to know something about the Google Pixel. Send me a comment and I’ll try to answer them either in the comments or via another blog post.
So last night I was setting up a machine and playing with a node project. I decided to jump into Bash on Windows to do node development and ran into a weird error. “ERROR in EINVAL: invalid argument, uv_interface_addresses.
After doing a little Googling I found some others posting this issue. What the problem stems from is related to iterating over network interfaces. When these scripts do this in Bash it apparently doesn’t work. I was able to switch to my normal command line with node install and run the same application though.
Figured I would share in case anyone else is struggling. We all need to remember this is Beta software and report the issues so they eventually get fixed.
In this case the issue is with os.networkInterfaces() call in the code I’m using.
My nodejs app looks like this and runs on nodejs on windows but fails on bash.
const os = require(‘os’);
var interfaces = os.networkInterfaces();
Video of issue:
Double post day. I must be getting ambitious…
So some videos popped online today regarding a new version of Microsoft Paint.
Why would Microsoft add 3D? Well my thought on this is two fold. How else are normal users going to create 3D content for the HoloLens? Also if rumors are true regarding an all-in-one Surface to be announced on October 26th, 2016 then they need some apps to show off on it. I think both use cases are awesome. The more 3D content creation we can get the better our AR/VR experiences will be. Everyone has to remember that Microsoft has opened their Holographic platform to OEMs so more devices will be coming as well as existing ones that will support that platform over time.
I’m working on figuring out how to get early access to play with it on my Surface Book right now. I’d love to play with it.
NOTE: Microsoft if you are listening give me a preview build to play with and I’ll do some screencasts with it.
Between October 5th and 7th Oculus held their Oculus/conn3ct event. This covered where Oculus is today as well as where it may go in the future. Mark Zuckerberg jumped on stage and even demoed some of their work. Zuckerberg made a comment that VR is a great platform to put “people first”. This comment is great for VR. My thought on this is everything with VR is about experiences. This comes in the shape of Social and even just Solo experiences where you have to put the user first.
Zuckerberg then jumped into a virtual reality demo showing of a social app. This included avatars with expressions and moving hands. The hand movement I easily understood since they were using the Oculus Touch. Even mouth movement is easy since it is off of audio. I’m not sure how they did facial expressions though. Unless there is a lot of extra features in the sensors that ship with it I don’t see how they pulled that off.
Some of the interactions shown in the demo were rather impressive. Through the use of context menus attached to the wrist of each hand a user is able to do things like answer a Facebook call or share something on Facebook. One example they showed was sharing a video. One could easily see this turning into a whiteboard and giving users a way to work remotely. This plays in very well to the vision Microsoft has showed for AR and VR working together. It will be interesting to see where this all ends up and when it is mainstream.
Oculus launched a few new pieces of hardware as well as announcing some things they are working on. The first piece of hardware they launched is Oculus Touch which has been the missing component for Oculus. The HTC Vive and PlayStation VR both launched with controllers out of the gates. It seems like it has been forever for Oculus to launch theirs. Oculus also launched a in-ear headset for the Rift as well. The third piece of hardware is additional sensors. To get room scale with the Rift you will need three sensors. The Oculus comes with one and the Touch controls do as well, but for room scale you need to buy one more. As of today only two pieces of hardware are available: Oculus Touch at $199.00 US and the Oculus Earphones at $49.00 US. The Sensors haven’t seemed to hit the store for pre-order yet but are supposed to cost $79.00.
The Oculus team discussed working toward a standalone version of the Oculus Rift as well. They also talked about a future where we would be untethered from the PC and yet use a PC to power it. This sort of plays into my vision of where I think Apple may go with Augmented Realty.
It is awesome living in the tech world today. We are on the cusp of some great things in Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, and AI. I can’t wait to see where this all lands in the next five years. I really hope to be part of it for sure.
So earlier this week Google had their “Made by Google” event. I figured I would put down in writing my thoughts on the event and where Google is going. This post will be focusing on the transformation that Google is starting to go through. I also plan a post on the Pixel itself as well as Daydream but that will be a different post.
I’ve seen a number of posts floating around the internet that “Google is becoming Apple”. Seems like a bit of click bait to me. Google is by no means becoming Apple. They don’t fully control the Android ecosystem. What they are acting like is Microsoft. Let that sync in for a bit…..
With this event Google announced their first fully designed by Google Phone. HTC happens to manufacture it but that is no different than the iPhone which is primarily built by Foxconn. Like Microsoft though Google will be competing not only against Apple but also against OEM’s that utilize the Android operating system. This to me is no different then Microsoft and they Surface Pro and Surface Book.
Apple is a pure Hardware company that controls its full ecosystem which Google will not be able to do with Android since they open sourced it. Google will never be a hardware company full stop. Their primary focus is on their Ad networks and they Google Play ecosystem. Apple is not and probably never will be at that scale. Apple will continue to be a hardware company for years to come, while Google will be a services company with hardware and OEM vendors.
A lot of the event was talking about Google Assistant and AI in general. This play is very similar to Microsoft. At Microsoft Ignite Satya Nadella spoke about “democratizing AI”. Both Google and Microsoft have their own AI plays going on. Microsoft is approaching it with their Cortana Assistant while Google has built their own as well. Machine Learning and Deep Learning are being attacked directly by both Microsoft and Google. This is not a place Apple has done really well in. I personally use an iPhone and iPad but Siri is not as intelligent as either Cortana or Google’s platforms.
Apple really is a hardware not software company. Just look at iTunes… They do great things with hardware but in the software world they just are not there. Google on the other hand is very well versed in software just like Microsoft. Both Microsoft and Google play in opensource quite a bit as well. Some can say Apple is going there with Swift, but it is still very early where Google and Microsoft have very mature software platforms.
Google is becoming Microsoft as much as Microsoft is becoming Google. The moves I’ve seen Microsoft in their new dedications to open source is much more of a Google style play. They are focused themselves on being a Cloud based company on every platform. Even Google does this with their applications on iOS. It is clear to me that Microsoft and Google are in a different category then Apple. I hope people stop comparing Google to Apple as they are two completely different things. I have no problem though with compairing Microsoft and Google.
Do you have some thoughts on this? If so reply and share your thoughts. Have a blog about it share a link as well. I’d love to hear what others are thinking.
This is the excerpt for your very first post.
This is your very first post. Click the Edit link to modify or delete it, or start a new post. If you like, use this post to tell readers why you started this blog and what you plan to do with it.